spacer.png, 0 kB
 
Gong Xi Fa Chai 
Happy CNY
Chinese New Year

Urgent

G4 pilots in Northeast
IPS is seeking experienced G4 pilots within reasonable driving distance of NY area airports.  Experienced pilots who are 12 month current, please send resume and data to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
News
New Russian Flight Levels E-mail
Having trouble viewing this email? Click here to view this email in your browser

Know someone who'd like this information?
Forward this email to a friend.
Air Training International, Ltd.

RUSSIAN RVSM NEWS BULLETIN

November 15, 2011

Visit our website at www.trainati.com or call us at 817.447.7564


Russian Federation Set for RVSM Implementation

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum is set for introduction in the Russian Federation and the neighboring countries of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. The date and time for this activation is November 17, 2011 at 0001UTC.

RVSM shall be applicable in that volume of airspace between FL 290 and FL 410 inclusive. The flight level allocation scheme used by the Russian implementation can be found in ICAO Annex 2, Appendix 3, Table A as seen to the right. Note this is based upon course True Track.

Operators will indicate RVSM state of registry operational approval by inserting "W" in block #10 of the ICAO flight plan form. Non-RVSM approved aircraft can not expect to operate between FL290 and FL410. Exceptions are permitted for state (i.e. Military) aircraft and civil aircraft on delivery, maintenance ferry or humanitarian flights. These flights should indicate "STS/NONRVSM" in block #18 of the ICAO flight plan.




More Changes to Russian Procedures

Flight at the transition level or above, an aircraft shall carry out QNE procedures and the vertical plane is expressed in terms of "Flight Levels". This is a standard procedure. Flight below the transition level differs slightly.

For flight below the transition level in the aerodrome area (control zone); Aircraft position in the vertical plane shall be assigned by ATC as a height, and reported by a flight crew in values using meters based upon the QFE procedures.

For flight below the transition level but, outside the aerodrome area (control zone);
Aircraft position in the vertical plane shall be assigned by ATC as an altitude, and reported by a flight crew in values using meters based upon the QNH procedures.

Specific lost radio communication flight levels have also been established. Flight levels 4250 (FL140), 4550 (FL150) or 7300 (FL240), 7600 (FL250) depending on the flight direction shall be considered as specially established flight levels for flights without radio communication. During an emergency, pilots may request that vertical assignments be made feet and to be assigned an altitude that is equal to the meters normally used by Russian ATC.


Mongolia RVSM Procedures Differ From Russian
Mongolia is set for RVSM implementation at the same time as the Russian Federation but, with a RVSM flight level allocation scheme more similar to China's RVSM. The Operators are required to use an approved chart for conversion vice onboard automation. The chart to use is printed right. Operators should also note that while inside Mongolian RVSM, flight Level assignments are made in meters but flown by reference to altimeters reading in feet. Flight Plan requested levels shall be expressed as "S" followed by 4 figures (such as S1250, S1220 and S1190 represent 12500m, 12200m and 11900m respectively).

An example of transitioning from Russian RVSM flight Levels (Assigned in feet, Flown in feet) to Mongolian RVSM flight levels (Assigned in meters, Flown in feet) is shown below.


References for Your Use

ICAO
EURASIA RVSM Task force, http://www.paris.icao.int/documents_open_meetings/files.php?subcategory_id=119
Annex2, http://www.bazl.admin.ch/dokumentation/grundlagen/02643/index.html

Russian Federation
Regional Monitoring Agency EURASIA, http://www.rma-eurasia.ru/index.html
Russian AIC #11/11 dated 20OCT11, http://www.caiga.ru/caica/

Mongolia
Policy and Procedures of Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) in the Airspace of Mongolia, http://nats.mcaa.gov.mn/index.php
Monitoring Agency for Asia Region, http://www.aerothai.co.th/maar/

Europe AIP's, http://www.eurocontrol.int/aim/public/standard_page/web_eur.html
Asia and Pacific AIP's, http://www.eurocontrol.int/aim/public/standard_page/web_ap.html

Air Training International, Ltd. (ATI) is an information service provider allowing our clients access to a variety of products with our training program as our cornerstone. Signing up with ATI will provide access to our electronic International Operations Quick Reference Handbook, plotting charts, Class II Navigation envelopes, cockpit guides and white paper analysis. Client service is paramount to us, so our subject matter experts are available to answer questions any time.
You are receiving this email because you are a current client of Air Training International, Ltd.
To stop receiving emails from ATI, click unsubscribe.
 
NEW: Runway Status Lights E-mail

Already in operation at DFW, SAN, LAX, BOS, and MCO.

The system will be operational at PHX, IAH, SEA, IAD, and LAS in 2012 and will be installed at 23 major airports nationwide by 2016.

What Are Runway Status Lights?
Runway Status Lights (RWSL) are a series of red in-pavement lights that warn pilots of high-speed aircraft or vehicles on runways. They operate independently of Air Traffic Control. Runway Status Lights have two states: ON (lights are illuminated red) and OFF (lights are off) and are switched automatically based on information from the airport surface surveillance systems. RWSL will improve airport safety by indicating when it is unsafe to enter, cross, or takeoff from a runway.
 
The RWSL system has two types of lights. Runway Entrance Lights (RELs) are installed at taxiways and Takeoff Hold Lights (THLs) on runways.
 
Runway Entrance Lights

Runway Entrance Lights (RELs) are a series of red in-pavement lights spaced evenly along the taxiway centerline from the taxiway hold line to the runway edge. One REL is placed before the hold line and one REL is placed near the runway centerline. RELs are directed toward the runway hold line and are oriented to be visible only to pilots entering or crossing the runway from that location. RELs that are ON (illuminated red) indicate that the runway ahead is not safe to enter or cross. Pilots should remain clear of a runway when RELs along their taxi route are illuminated. Lights that are off convey no meaning.
 
The system is not, at any time, intended to convey approval or clearance to proceed into a runway.
Pilots remain obligated to comply with all ATC clearances, except when compliance would require crossing illuminated red RELs. In such a case, the crews should hold short of the runway for RELs, contact ATC, and await further instructions.   
 
Takeoff Hold Lights

The Takeoff Hold Light (THLs) system is composed of red in-pavement fixtures in a double row on either side of the runway centerline lighting. Fixtures are focused toward the arrival end of the runway at the “Line Up and Wait” point and extend in front of the holding aircraft beginning 375’ beyond the runway threshold and extending for 1,500’. Illuminated red lights provide a signal, to an aircraft in position for takeoff or rolling, that it is unsafe to takeoff because the runway is occupied or about to be occupied by another aircraft or ground vehicle. THLs that are ON (illuminated red) indicate that the runway ahead is not safe to takeoff. Pilots should refuse takeoff clearance if THLs are illuminated. Red THLs mean do not takeoff. Whenever a pilot observes the red lights of the THLs, the pilot will stop or remain stopped. The pilot will contact ATC for resolution if any clearance is in conflict with the lights. Lights that are off convey no meaning. The system is not, at any time, intended to convey approval or clearance to takeoff. Pilots must still receive an ATC clearance to takeoff. 
 
Pilots are encouraged to learn more about RWSL at:
http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/rwsl/

See this Notice in living color at https://www.faasafety.gov/files/notices/2011/Aug/RWSL.pdf

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 31 August 2011 )
 
Solar Activity Peak E-mail

Apparently, the sun is approaching what's known as solar maximum—the high point in its roughly 11-year cycle of activity, according to National Geographic. Scientists anticipate stronger storms around solar max, in 2013.  Flares have occurred almost daily, and may be monitored online or with iPad applications like Solar Monitor Pro.  Flares can precipitate warnings for multiple types of interest the most significant be S3 through S5 which may represent health risks to all occupants of aircraft at typical flight levels. 

Last Updated ( Monday, 29 August 2011 )
 
Effective: 30 June 2010 E-mail

Runway Crossing Procedure Change

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 30 June 2010 )
Read more...
 
Chinese RVSM E-mail

(Update: 25 Oct 08) China implemented its permanent transition to a metric equivalent of RVSM, effective 21 Nov 2007.  Please check NOTAMS and charts if planning ops in theatre during this period. Contact IPS if you wish to purchase our table that includes both Chinese and Russian cruising altitudes. 

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 October 2009 )
 
F/O Type Ratings (Update 18Feb07) E-mail

Effective 6 June 2006; non-type rated First Officers whom are planning to operate outside of US Airspace, will be required to obtain a "co-pilot's type rating" from your FSDO.  Guidance is available from the FAA website, in FAA Notice 8000.351

http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/examiners_inspectors/8000/media/N8000_351.pdf 

Alternately, they may be trained to type rating PTS by Flight Safety, CAE or a designated PPE.  This is crucial to port state conformity checks (ala SAFA et al). 

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 October 2009 )
 
Offset Recommendation E-mail

IPS recommends offsets in any airspace where ATC might be compromised, whether in Class I or Class II airspace.  Somewhat like SLOP, we have extended our decade old policy for Africa to any region where GPS and RVSM accuracy have the potential of delivering aircraft radome to radome with any gaps in traffic management.  Offsets are always within the containment value of the airspace (.1 to .7 nm right of course) and intended to miss other traffic. 

 See the editorial in ProPilot's December  2006, issue ( Outer Marker Inbound ).

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 October 2009 )
 
ICAO age 60 & other Annex 1 Changes E-mail

Age limit for flight crew and other Annex 1 changes to SARPs

Amendment 167 to Annex 1
The ICAO Council adopted on 10 March 2006 an amendment to Annex 1 - Personnel Licensing that increases by five years the upper age limit for commercial pilots operating two-pilot aircraft. Althought this applies to ICAO airspace, contracting states have to either adopt the change or publish an exception to the ICAO change.  The US will likely publish an exception since the FAA still holds as current the "Age 60 Rule".  (By the way, the US holds more exceptions to the Convention than any other single country.) The new provisions become applicable on 23 November 2006, will affect rights of contracting and adopting states to implement.  IPS has made all 65 pages of the ICAO CWP available online (at the end of next page), which covers other significant changes to Annex 1. 

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 October 2009 )
Read more...
 
Operations Over Africa E-mail

ImageHow do you tell when you are flying over Africa? 

Seriously, traffic tripled in the 1990's and continues to grow. 

Despite recent inprovements, traffic management in Africa remains deficient--critically so in some areas.  Some controllers do not communicate effectively with aircraft under their "control".  Some centers do not communicate with one another-at times due to equipment, sometimes due to politics.

 

 

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 October 2009 )
Read more...
 
Download Eurpoean SAFA Inspection Form E-mail

ImageIPS seeks to communicate to all GA operators the validity and significance of SAFA inspections, currently in use in Europe and the ECAC countries*.  The method of determining aircraft to be checked may be random or targeted, and may depend upon variables such as the number of inspectors available, causal factors, suspicion of not upholding ICAO standards, et cetera.  The number of inspections will range from very few to several hundred per year, per country.  Download a copy of a SAFA form,.....

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 October 2009 )
Read more...
 


spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
International Pilot Services and www.intl-pilot.com © 2006 - All Rights Reserved